Zapdos at the EUIC and in the Unbroken Bonds Meta

Guten Tag, meine Freunde! Unbroken Bonds had finally arrived, and there is plenty of buzz and excitement about all of the new deck possibilities that have arrived with it. For those of us here in Europe however, one last tournament remains for the Team Up era. The OCIC brought us into this format, and so it is fitting that the EUIC will close it out!

[cardimg name=”Zapdos” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM159″ align=”right” c=”none”][/cardimg]

Throughout this quarter, I’ve been rather adamant about the strength of [card name=”Zapdos” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM159″ c=”name”][/card] (with [card name=”Jolteon-GX ” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM173″ c=”name”][/card] in particular). Shortly after Team Up was released, I declared Zapdos to be the BDIF. Looking back now that the quarter is nearing its end, I believe that declaration to have been accurate. Zapdos started things off by winning the OCIC and has been the most dominant deck in terms of Regional & SPE Top 8 finishes by a solid margin (with 32 Top 8s in 14 events – a number which jumps even higher if you count the [card name=”Pikachu and Zekrom-GX” set=”Team Up” no=”33″ c=”name”][/card] / Zapdos decks). This is almost 40% more finishes than the next closest deck ([card name=”Zoroark-GX” set=”Shining Legends” no=”53″ c=”name”][/card] with 23)! Personally, this is the first quarter in recent memory that I’ve stuck with a single deck the entire time. Normally, I switch decks fairly often, as I jump from concept to concept; however, for this quarter, I’ve been impressed enough by the strength of Zapdos and the lack of widespread counters to the deck that I’ve felt no need to switch. Fittingly, as I began the Team Up quarter writing about Zapdos, I’ll be ending it by writing about it again. For this article, I’ll first take a look at the deck’s dominance during this last quarter, and why I expect it to perform well at the EUIC in the same way it did at the OCIC. After that, I’ll go beyond Team Up, and take a look forward into the deck’s place in the future meta of Unbroken Bonds.

First, an important question: why is Zapdos still good going into Berlin?

Zapdos at the EUIC

A Helpful Pattern

Thus far, the US results have followed somewhat of a pattern: the deck that beats the deck that beats the deck that won the last tournament will win the next one. At the OCIC, [card name=”Zapdos” set=”Team Up” no=”40″ c=”name”][/card] won and was then seen as the dominant deck. Then, in Collinsville, [card name=”Zoroark-GX” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM84″ c=”name”][/card] decks were the most played, possibly due to their strong Zapdos matchup. The winning deck then ended up being something not with a strong Zapdos matchup, but one with a strong Zoroark matchup: [card name=”Blacephalon-GX” set=”Lost Thunder” no=”52″ c=”name”][/card] / [card name=”Naganadel” set=”Lost Thunder” no=”108″ c=”name”][/card]. In Denver, Zapdos decks were the most popular deck again, possibly due to its strong Blacephalon matchup – and then Zapdos counters dominated the Top 8. If that reactionary pattern continues, one would expect to see a lot of play from decks which counter ZoroControl, [card name=”Regigigas” set=”Crimson Invasion” no=”84″ c=”name”][/card], and [card name=”Celebi and Venusaur-GX” set=”Team Up” no=”1″ c=”name”][/card], followed by a win from a deck with a strong matchup against those counter decks. The two decks that best fit that “counter deck” profile are Blacephalon-GX and [card name=”Malamar” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM117″ c=”name”][/card] – both of which are excellent matchups for Zapdos!

If the pattern does indeed hold true, then Zapdos is a great pick for the EUIC. If players gravitate toward the successful anti-Zapdos decks from Denver, then the early rounds will be a minefield for any Zapdos player. If they avoid those poor matchups in the early rounds, however, then the later rounds should be full of positive matchups, such as Blacephalon and Malamar. If players overpredict the prevalence of the anti-Zapdos decks, then the early field will be even better. Zapdos also has an advantage as one of the format’s strongest decks, so I would consider it to be a rather safe play overall. Even if anti-Zapdos decks are indeed popular, they won’t make up more than a third of the field; they didn’t accomplsh this in either Collinsville or Denver, even after Zapdos’s OCIC success. Even at that number, that still leaves six rounds of even-to-positive matchups for Zapdos, more than enough to get some Championship Points. With a bit of luck, that kind of a field is more than ripe for a Zapdos player to make a deep run into day two and beyond.

Pattern Rationale

Now, it is worth noting that this “pattern” isn’t a hard rule, but rather, a consequence that has manifested itself as a result of a diverse Tier 1 with no clear agreed upon BDIF, as well as natural meta cyclicality. As far as the Tier 1 matchups go, most haven’t changed all that much since the OCIC.

[cardimg name=”Zoroark-GX” set=”Shining Legends” no=”53″ align=”right” c=”custom”]Control ebbs and flows[/cardimg]

Whenever a deck wins a major tournament like a US Regionals, it makes sense that players will gravitate toward a deck with a good matchup against that winning deck – after all, why would you want to play something that loses to the deck that won? However, since the current format has been rather evenly matched, such a strategy hasn’t been a successful one. Simply winning a major event hasn’t caused a deck to increase in popularity, and the format has been varied enough that simply having a strong matchup against the “deck to beat” isn’t enough to achieve tournament success. So, the number of counter decks increase, but the numbers of the decks that they are countering do not. This makes things more dangerous for players who have decided to stick with the winning deck, but doesn’t necessarily make things easier for those who have tried to counter it. Likewise, for players using decks which are strong against those counter decks, but weaker against the winning deck, the number of positive matchups they have increase. As the tournament reaches its later stages, we get the following result:

• The winning deck struggles early, against the increased number of counter decks
• The counter decks initially succeed, but then struggle against the wider field, since they aren’t as strong into a generic matchup
• Decks strong against the counter decks then have strong matchups against the Day Two field, if they’ve made it that far

Applying this logic to Denver’s Top 8 results, I would not at all be surprised if people jumped away from Zapdos as a deck. Between the two Regigigas, the Celebi & Venusaur, and the winning ZoroControl deck, it would be easy to come to the impression that the field was a terrible one for Zapdos. In the most recent major European event (SPE Bolanzo), the Top 8 was mixed; four of the decks appeared to be matchups unfavorable for Zapdos, but the three Zapdos decks also ended up being three of the Top 4 decks (including the winning deck). I wouldn’t, however, expect many players to change over to the various Control decks that did well. Control, as an archetype, seems to be naturally unpalatable for quite a few players to pilot, more so than other decks. My expected field would thus include an increased number of anti-Control decks such as Blacephalon-GX and Malamar, without a huge increase in the number of Control decks. While the strong matchups for those decks might not increase, if Zapdos does indeed see a drop in play, then the field will still be better for those anti-Control decks. For a deck like Zapdos, the number of positive matchups will also then increase. Therefore, if a Zapdos player can avoid the Control decks in the early rounds, the rest of the tournament will likely go well. 

[premium]

New Matchups from Denver

On the plus side for Zapdos, the previously established Tier 1 decks – PikaRom, Malamar, Blacephalon-GX, and Zoroark-GX – all remain about the same matchup-wise as they did before. None of those decks, with the exception of Zoroark-GX, have had many changes to their lists, and so any positive matchups that Zapdos had against them in Collinsville and Denver will also remain positive heading into the EUIC. For the three new Top 8 decks to establish themselves in Denver – Regigigas, Celebi and Venusaur, and ZoroControl, the Zapdos matchups into those are roughly as follows:

Regigigas

I’ve mentioned this before, but given recent results, I’d like to reiterate the importance for techs that allow Zapdos to be competitive against Regigigas. The list I’ve been using has indeed been strong against Regigigas, thanks to the inclusions of Zeraora-GX and Acerola. The list that won the Bolanzo SPE also was built in a way that allowed it to take down Regigigas, as it played Zeraora-GX and Marshadow. Zeraora-GX, more than anything, appears to be the key to the matchup, as it gives the Zapdos player three huge advantages in the matchup that it would otherwise not have. First, Zeraora-GX allows the Zapdos player to easily pivot between attackers, so that they can continually attack without using up any resources. Second, it gives the Zapdos player an option for Energy recovery via Full Voltage GX; without this option, it isn’t too difficult for the Regigigas player to eventually get rid of all of the Zapdos player’s Energy, whereas with it, the odds of that happening diminish considerably. Finally, Zeraora-GX itself is an excellent attacker into Regigigas, since it only needs one Electropower to get a OHKO (assuming no other modifiers).

VenuHerbs

[cardimg name=”Celebi and Venusaur-GX” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM167″ align=”right” c=”custom”][/cardimg]

Celebi & Venusaur was the deck that made up ⅔ of my losses in Denver, as well as the deck that defeated me in the Top 8. This deck is a brutal one for Zapdos to deal with, though it can be beaten if things go well. Getting the first KO isn’t much of an issue, thanks to Tapu Koko GX, but the second one is almost impossible to obtain. To beat CeleSaur with Zapdos, you need to be able to continually attack and put pressure on, with the hope that they will eventually run out of healing resources, and you’ll be able to get off a massive attack with enough Electropower to get that second KO. They have plenty of Judge to disrupt that plan, though this also shuffles in their hand, so their use of Judge gives you a chance that they will brick afterward.

ZoroControl

Finally, ZoroControl is the newest major threat to come out of Denver. I don’t have too much to say about this matchup, except that it is an absolutely atrocious one for Zapdos. A 1-1 Alolan Muk line is tough enough to deal with; a 2-2 line is almost impossible. On top of that, they play Bodybuilding Dumbbells, multiple Crushing Hammer, and multiple Acerola, all of which make getting Knock Outs even more difficult. Honestly, your best bet in this matchup is to donk it – if they do get set up, they will almost certainly win.

List Changes

Going forward into Berlin, the only change I will be making to my list is to add in a copy of [card name=”Marshadow” set=”Shining Legends” no=”45″ c=”name”][/card]. I’ve been resistant to this tech in the past, as I don’t believe that it does much for the deck, particularly in my Lillie-free build. My list doesn’t have many reliable ways to search it out in a way that allows me to use Let Loose, and since I don’t play Zapdos as a setup deck, the advantage of being able to use that T1 Let Loose isn’t as strong as it is in other matchups. With that said, given the projected EUIC meta, I do believe that having some form of disruption would be useful for the deck going forward. Against Regigigas and CeleSaur in particular, having a turn of disruption can drastically increase the Zapdos player’s odds of winning. In both cases, Marshadow’s usefulness is not in the early game, but later to prevent the Regigigas or CeleSaur player from simply sitting on a hand of important cards. I still don’t believe that the card will be strong in the early game – I won’t be aiming for the T1 Marshadow play – but the option is there if I want it. To make room for the Marshadow, I will be cutting the Wobbuffet; Zoroark decks seem to be more noxious toward Zapdos than ever, to the point where the tech likely won’t be as useful as I would like it to be. Alolan Muk thankfully hasn’t seen a ton of play outside of Zoroark-GX decks, with the exception of Blacephalon-GX / Naganadel, which is a strong matchup even if they do get Alolan Muk into play. The PikaRom matchup is the other impacted matchup here, though I’ve found that most PikaRom players will simply prioritize using their Tapu Koko Prism Star, effectively negating Wobbuffet’s usefulness by doing so.

Zapdos after Unbroken Bonds

For those of you who aren’t heading to the EUIC, you’re probably not as interested in Team Up Standard as you are in the quickly coming future of Unbroken Bonds. The new archetypes are certainly exciting, and will at the least force a reevaluation of what is “Tier 1”. I’ll be going over some new archetypes in a future article, but for right now, I’m going to take this opportunity to look at how Zapdos will respond to the additions and threats coming out with the new set.

New Options for Zapdos

New Pokemon

As far as Pokemon go, Unbroken Bonds doesn’t do a whole lot for Lightning decks. There aren’t any must-add attackers, even for Rainbow Zapdos or Zapdos / [card name=”Lycanroc-GX” set=”Guardians Rising” no=”138″ c=”name”][/card] variants.

[cardimg name=”Marshadow” set=”Shining Legends” no=”45″ align=”right” c=”custom”]Maybe worthwhile now[/cardimg]

There are two tech Pokemon that I think could eventually find their way into a Zapdos variant, but I wouldn’t recommend putting either of them in quite yet. Those Pokemon are [card name=”Marshadow” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”81″ c=”name”][/card] and [card name=”Mewtwo” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”75″ c=”name”][/card]. Mewtwo has a nifty Ability, which has the potential to combo well with [card name=”Jirachi” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM161″ c=”name”][/card]. In the later stages of the game, having a guaranteed way to get back a [card name=”Guzma” set=”Burning Shadows” no=”115″ c=”name”][/card] or [card name=”Acerola” set=”Burning Shadows” no=”112″ c=”name”][/card] would certainly be useful. Marshadow doesn’t have nearly as much versatility, but could become a useful card if certain decks become popular. In particular, Marshadow would be the best option against the combo of [card name=”Honchkrow-GX” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”109″ c=”name”][/card] and either [card name=”Black Market Prism Star” set=”Team Up” no=”134″ c=”name”][/card] or [card name=”Wondrous Labyrinth Prism Star” set=”Team Up” no=”158″ c=”name”][/card]. I don’t necessarily think that this matchup would be a difficult one for Zapdos (especially with Jolteon-GX), but if those combos become widespread, Marshadow would be a strong tech. To start, I don’t think I will include either Mewtwo or Marshadow; with that said, both are worth keeping in mind going forward.

New Trainers

While the Pokemon from Unbroken Bonds might not be great for Zapdos, there are a variety of new Trainer cards which are useful additions. The two cards which I want to try out immediately are [card name=”Electromagnetic Radar” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”169″ c=”name”][/card] and [card name=”Red’s Challenge” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”184″ c=”name”][/card]. Electromagnetic Radar will replace one of the [card name=”Ultra Ball” set=”Sun and Moon” no=”135″ c=”name”][/card]. I don’t necessarily want to replace both of them, given that I’ll still want to reliably be able to search out my various non-GXs, and losing both Ultra Ball may impact that consistency. Currently, I’m not entirely convinced that the benefit of being able to search out two GXs will outweigh that slight loss of consistency. I only play a few GXs, after all, and the situations in which I need more than one are few. That scenario can come up occasionally however, so I do want to do a “trial run” with one, in order to evaluate it. The other new card I am eager to try is the new Supporter, Red’s Challenge. This is the one new card that I could foresee becoming a staple in Zapdos decks, due to its impact on situational consistency. There are many, many times where only one card is needed to make a particular play, so Red’s Challenge would be a perfect addition.

Other potential inclusions include [card name=”Energy Spinner” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”170″ c=”name”][/card], [card name=”Giovanni’s Exile” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”174″ c=”name”][/card], [card name=”Koga’s Trap” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”177″ c=”name”][/card], [card name=”Lt. Surge’s Strategy” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”178″ c=”name”][/card], and [card name=”Pokégear 3.0″ set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”182″ c=”name”][/card]. Energy Spinner I would consider an automatic addition to any Zapdos deck with Fighting Energy (or any non-Lightning basic Energy for that matter), especially if that list already plays [card name=”Volkner” set=”Ultra Prism” no=”135″ c=”name”][/card]. PokeGear 3.0 is a great consistency card, especially in conjunction with Jirachi. I wouldn’t consider it a necessary inclusion right now, as Zapdos tends to be rather consistent. Post-rotation, however, I would expect Jirachi + PokeGear 3.0 to be a common consistency engine. Lt. Surge’s Strategy is a tempting option for any deck, though it likely won’t be effective in Zapdos, given that the deck tends to play from ahead. Finally, Koga’s Trap and Giovanni’s Exile are admittedly weaker additions to this list of inclusions, but they do have potentially niche uses as an additional damage modifier and an Acerola replacement, so I didn’t want to exclude them entirely – though I certainly wouldn’t include them in my own list.

New Threats

Along with additional cards to add to existing decks, Unbroken Bonds will also bring with it a whole host of new deck archetypes which should see play. While I haven’t been able to thoroughly test against most of these yet, I’m going to go through them, in order to give you an idea of what to expect. Once more thorough testing occurs, and the decklists for these new archetypes become more refined, I would be more comfortable designating them as good and bad matchups for Zapdos. Until then, here is some theorymon!

One thing that makes me think that Zapdos will find initial success in Unbroken Bonds Standard is the deck’s natural strength in speed and damage output. In the initial stages of a new format or the release of a new set, players tend to be far more experimental with what they play. After all, everyone wants to be the one to “break” a new archetype – and get all of the success that comes with doing so! Against a field of experimental decks, the best plays tend to be established decks that are consistently strong against a varied field. Zapdos fits that role well and will likely end up acting as somewhat of a gatekeeper for new decks.

Reshiram & Charizard GX

This matchup should, in theory, play out similarly to the PikaRom matchup. [card name=”Tapu Koko-GX” set=”Guardians Rising” no=”47″ c=”name”][/card] will be a stellar attacker, given the high Energy costs of [card name=”Reshiram and Charizard-GX” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”20″ c=”name”][/card]’s attacks. To get the other KO, the Zapdos player simply needs to aim for a two-shot, though a 3HKO may also be sufficient. For ReshiZard to win this matchup, it would need to be paired up with another attacker. [card name=”Volcanion” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”25″ c=”name”][/card] is the best candidate for beating Zapdos, as its 120 HP and 110 damage attack (with enough Energy in play) are excellent numbers for the matchup. Another huge potential threat is [card name=”Miltank” set=”Crimson Invasion” no=”78″ c=”name”][/card], which could potentially stop Zapdos’ 2HKO strategy. I haven’t yet played against a version of ReshiZard that utilizes Miltank, but such a version did recently win Champions League Kyoto, so that is something to look for going forward.

Baby Blacephalon

This matchup is a tough one to evaluate, simply because it hasn’t yet been established how exactly [card name=”Blacephalon” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”32″ c=”name”][/card] decks will be able to consistently attack. Zapdos has an advantage here in terms of ease of attacking, whereas Blacephalon has an advantage in HP and damage output. Champions League Kyoto had no successful versions of this archetype, though that was likely due to the widespread use of the new disruption card Reset Stamp, which we won’t have yet. Most early Blacephalon lists appear to be weak to hand disruption, so Marshadow will be a must use card in this matchup. [card name=”Jolteon-GX ” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM173″ c=”name”][/card] will also probably be a go-to attacker, in the same way it is into matchups such as [card name=”Granbull” set=”Lost Thunder” no=”138″ c=”name”][/card], thanks to its higher HP, damage output, and Swift Run GX.

Gardevoir & Sylveon GX

[cardimg name=”Tapu Koko-GX” set=”Guardians Rising” no=”135″ align=”right” c=”none”][/cardimg]

This deck doesn’t have a great name yet, but it does have quite a bit of hype. [card name=”Gardevoir and Sylveon-GX” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”130″ c=”name”][/card] was the most pre-ordered of any of the GXs on TCGplayer, so I would expect a solid amount of it initially. The Japanese lists for the deck have either played Gardevoir & Sylveon-GX by itself or have paired it with [card name=”Ribombee” set=”Lost Thunder” no=”146″ c=”name”][/card], in both cases, making a powerful tanky deck. Tapu Koko-GX will play the same role in this matchup as it does in the other Tag Team matchups, but Gardevoir & Sylveon does have a unique way around that threat: [card name=”Fairy Charm L” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”172″ c=”name”][/card]. Between the tankiness and healing, Gardevoir & Sylveon does look to be a rather tricky matchup for Zapdos. If the [card name=”Acerola” set=”Burning Shadows” no=”142″ c=”name”][/card] focused builds become popular, then [card name=”Mr. Mime” set=”Team Up” no=”66″ c=”name”][/card] will be a reliable tech against it. 

Lucario & Melmetal GX

As far as the new decks go, [card name=”Lucario and Melmetal-GX” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”120″ c=”name”][/card] is probably the one I would want to face the least. I’ve got plenty of experience playing against Beast Box thanks to my brother Alex, so I can attest to how difficult it is for Zapdos to deal with a constant -30 damage modifier. I imagine that most Lucario & Melmetal decks will play in a similarly tanky manner, and so will be a similarly awful matchup for Zapdos. The good news here is that any Fire matchup for Lucario & Melmetal GX will probably be difficult, so I wouldn’t expect to see much Metal stuff initially, given the hype behind Reshiram & Charizard GX and Baby Blacephalon.

Honchkrow-GX

Unfair GX is, well, unfair! The good news is that if you manage to start with Jirachi, the impact of losing your hand turn 1 isn’t all that bad. If you don’t draw out of the Unfair GX attack, then the game will expectedly go poorly, but if you do, then Zapdos / Jolteon should have an excellent matchup from that point on. [card name=”Honchkrow-GX” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”109″ c=”name”][/card] is weak to Lightning, and can easily be OHKOd by [card name=”Jolteon-GX ” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM173″ c=”name”][/card]’s Head Bolt or Swift Run GX as a result. Zapdos doesn’t rely on Special Energy, Stadium cards, or Tool cards, so I wouldn’t worry too much about Night Ruler either. If they can lock into play [card name=”Wondrous Labyrinth Prism Star” set=”Team Up” no=”158″ c=”name”][/card] or [card name=”Black Market Prism Star” set=”Team Up” no=”134″ c=”name”][/card], that may cause a slowdown, but I have to imagine that the matchup will end up being rather positive for Zapdos lists containing Jolteon-GX.

Pheromosa & Buzzwole GX

Once again, this is a matchup that will be difficult to evaluate until more refined lists for the deck come out. The list from Champions League Chiba would likely cause incredible problems for Zapdos, but it remains to be seen if that will be the popular way to play [card name=”Pheromosa and Buzzwole-GX” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”1″ c=”name”][/card]. The format in which that list had success was prior to the release of Double Blaze, and so didn’t include the rather hyped Reshiram & Charizard GX. The lack of success for the deck in Champions League Kyoto doesn’t bode well for this archetype going forward, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see it in a more diverse American meta. Zapdos’s best strategy against it will be the tried and true 2HKO on one, Tapu Thunder GX on one, though any tankier versions of the deck will certainly be difficult to beat.

Other Stuff and Conclusions

The six decks I’ve talked about thus far might be the most popular concepts thus far in early Unbroken Bonds discussions, but I wouldn’t expect new innovations to be limited to them. Zoroark-GX will likely find a pairing with at least something new, be it [card name=”Dewgong” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”45″ c=”name”][/card] or another Pokemon. [card name=”Triple Acceleration Energy” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”190″ c=”name”][/card] will also likely have an impact, giving new life to cards such as [card name=”Nidoqueen” set=”Sun and Moon Black Star Promos” no=”SM160″ c=”name”][/card] and [card name=”Aerodactyl” set=”Team Up” no=”130″ c=”name”][/card]. [card name=”Lt. Surge’s Strategy” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”178″ c=”name”][/card] will benefit plenty of decks, especially ones that prefer to play from a Prize deficit. [card name=”Green’s Exploration” set=”Unbroken Bonds” no=”175″ c=”name”][/card] has plenty of innovative uses that have yet to be explored. Overall, there will be plenty to look at with Unbroken Bonds!

Given the matchups I have gone over, Zapdos’ future appears somewhat unclear. The tankier decks will likely be difficult, whereas the more aggressive decks will be easier matchups. Once we get a better idea of how the Unbroken Bonds archetypes perform against the rest of the existing Tier 1 decks, then we’ll likewise have a better idea of where Zapdos stands going forward. Barring some unexpected shakeups, I would predict Zapdos to have early success, with its outlook becoming slightly worse as the new lists become more refined.

With that, we’ve reached the end of this article! As always, if you have any questions, as always, don’t hesitate to ask, either here, directly, or in our PTCG Subscribers’ Hideout! For those of you at the EUIC, viel Glück! For those of you who aren’t, best of luck testing Unbroken Bonds!

Thanks for reading!

[/premium]